The Business Habits Worth Stealing This Quarter
Every new quarter, I hear some version of the same complaint from founders and operators: “We had a plan in January, and somewhere around March it just… evaporated.” Nobody killed it on purpose. The daily fires just buried it. A client emergency here, a hiring scramble there, until the strategy document became something people referenced in meetings but never actually opened.
So this quarter, instead of writing another “10 tips” listicle, I sat down with someone who’s spent the last two decades in the room when that plan either survives or dies: Grace Halloran, an executive and business coach who’s worked with everyone from three person agencies to mid size manufacturing firms trying to professionalize how they run themselves. I wanted to know, not in theory but in practice, what separates the businesses that actually execute a general business strategy from the ones that just write one down and hope.
We talked for almost two hours. I trimmed the conversation for length, not for honesty, including the parts where she pushed back on questions I thought were pretty reasonable.
“Most strategy documents are eulogies, not plans”
Me: Let’s start blunt. What’s actually broken in how most small and mid size businesses approach strategy?
Grace: Honestly? Most strategy documents are eulogies, not plans. Someone writes them once, usually in a burst of January optimism, and then nobody touches them again until it’s time to write the next one. That’s not a strategy. That’s a time capsule.
A real general business strategy isn’t a document at all, if you want to get technical about it. It’s a set of habits. It’s the rhythm a company keeps: the questions it asks itself on a schedule, the decisions it revisits, the things it refuses to let slide even when everyone’s busy. Harvard Business Review ran a piece years ago (it still holds up) about what actually makes an executive effective, and none of it was about having a brilliant five year vision. It was about things like knowing where your time actually goes versus where you think it goes, and pushing decisions down to the lowest level that can competently make them. Boring stuff. Repeatable stuff.
Me: So the habit matters more than the plan itself?
Grace: The habit is the plan, eventually. A plan with no habit behind it is a wish.
Habit #1: Put a real review on the calendar, not a status update
What a real quarterly review actually asks
Me: Okay, let’s get concrete. If someone’s starting fresh this quarter, what’s the first habit you’d tell them to steal?
Grace: The quarterly business review. Done properly, that’s rarer than you’d think. Most companies that “do QBRs” are really just doing a longer version of their weekly status meeting. Revenue’s up, revenue’s down, here’s the pipeline, everyone nods, meeting ends.
A real quarterly review asks harder questions. What did we say we’d do ninety days ago, and did we actually do it? If not, why not? Was the goal wrong, or did we just not execute? What’s the market telling us that our plan didn’t account for? Indeed has a genuinely useful breakdown of how to run these reviews without them turning into theater, and one thing they get right is separating the review from the reporting. You’re not there to present numbers. You’re there to interrogate them. That kind of review is what turns a general business strategy from a slide deck into something the company actually runs on.
What “interrogate” actually means
Me: What does “interrogate” look like in practice? I feel like that word alone would scare off a lot of small business owners.
Grace: Fair point, bad word choice for a nervous founder. What I mean is: don’t let anyone in the room, including yourself, get away with a vague answer. If someone says “marketing underperformed,” your next question isn’t a nod, it’s “underperformed against what, and what did we learn about the channel versus the message versus the offer?” You’re not trying to assign blame. You’re trying to find out if your model of the business matches reality, because if it doesn’t, you’re just dressing up guesswork as strategy for everything downstream of that model.
Habit #2: Set goals you can actually kill or keep, every ninety days
Why OKRs still earn their keep
Me: Let’s talk about goal setting. OKRs, objectives and key results, come up constantly in these conversations. Is that still the right framework, or has it become a buzzword that’s lost its teeth?
Grace: Both, honestly. It’s overused as a term and underused as a discipline. OKRs are one of the clearest ways to operationalize a general business strategy, if people actually use them right. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has a good explainer on why smaller business owners specifically benefit from OKRs, and the core idea holds up regardless of company size: you separate the ambitious “why” (the objective) from the measurable “did it happen” (the key results). The failure mode isn’t the framework, it’s companies writing objectives that are really just tasks in disguise, or key results so soft you can claim victory no matter what happened.
Me: Give me an example of a “soft” key result.
Grace: “Improve customer satisfaction.” Improve it by how much, measured how, by when? Compare that to “raise NPS from 32 to 45 by the end of Q2, using the same survey instrument we used last quarter.” One of those you can fail at. And you need to be able to fail at your goals. That’s what makes them real. Atlassian’s OKR guide gets at this well: a key result should feel a little uncomfortable to commit to. If everyone in the room is confident you’ll hit it, it wasn’t ambitious enough to count as strategy. It was just a forecast.
How often to revisit them
Me: How often should these get revisited? Quarterly, obviously, but does anything happen in between?
Grace: Quarterly for setting them, but I push clients toward a short checkpoint, fifteen or twenty minutes, every other week. Not a status meeting. Just: is this key result still the right one, given what we’ve learned since we set it? Google’s re:Work materials on goal setting make a point I like: OKRs work best as a living conversation, not a contract you sign in January and grade yourself on in December. If you’re only looking at them at the finish line, you’ve turned a compass into a report card.
Habit #3: Protect your calendar like it’s the actual product
Time is the resource nobody protects
Me: Let’s shift to something more personal, how leaders spend their actual hours. You said something to me off the record earlier that I want on the record: “Most founders think they don’t have time for strategy. They have time. They’ve just given all of it away.”
Grace: I’ll stand by that. People treat time blocking like a productivity hack, some little trick for getting through your inbox faster. For an executive, it’s closer to a survival skill. If you don’t proactively decide where your attention goes, your calendar becomes a public good. Anyone can claim a piece of it, and eventually someone will claim all of it. There’s decent research out there now specifically on how leaders protect deep work time, and the pattern is consistent: the ones who actually think strategically, the ones actually running a general business strategy and not just a to do list, defend a block of uninterrupted time the same way they’d defend a client contract. Nobody “accidentally” schedules over a client call. But they’ll let literally anything eat into a strategy block.
Delegation is time blocking’s less glamorous sibling
Me: And delegation fits into this how?
Grace: It’s the less glamorous sibling. You can’t protect time for strategic thinking if you’re still the one approving expense reports and proofreading emails that don’t need your eyes. I’ve seen good breakdowns on this. The ones that stick with me frame delegation not as “getting things off your plate” but as a leadership tool in its own right, a way of building capability in the people around you. If you’re delegating purely to reduce your own workload, you’ll delegate badly. You’ll hand off the wrong things, at the wrong time, with too little context, and then conclude “delegation doesn’t work here” when really you just did it wrong.
Me: What’s the actual test for whether something should be delegated?
Grace: Ask two questions. Can someone else do this at seventy percent of my quality or better within a reasonable timeframe? And does doing this myself actually require my specific judgment, or does it just feel safer because I’ve always done it? Most founders fail that second question a dozen times a week and don’t notice.
Habit #4: Make the decision making process itself a habit
Me: You mentioned Drucker earlier, the “effective executive” idea. Can you unpack that a bit more? What does it mean for a business’s actual strategy, not just the person at the top?
Grace: Drucker’s argument boils down to this: effectiveness isn’t a personality trait. It’s a set of practices anyone can learn. Knowing where your time goes. Focusing on contribution rather than effort. Building on strengths instead of trying to fix every weakness. Making decisions in the right order and not too many of them. That last one is underrated. A lot of leaders think good strategy means having strong opinions on everything. It’s the opposite. Good strategy means having very strong opinions about the two or three decisions that actually matter this quarter, and being almost indifferent about the rest. Getting that shortlist right is most of what a general business strategy actually is this quarter.
Me: How do you find those two or three decisions?
Grace: Ask what would actually change the trajectory of the business if you got it right, versus what just needs to get handled. Hiring your first VP of Sales might be one of those trajectory decisions. Which shade of blue is on the website is not, no matter how long that meeting runs. I’ve watched leadership teams spend ninety minutes on the blue.
Habit #5: Don’t let the habit live only in your head
Me: Everything so far sounds like it depends heavily on the person at the top actually doing it. How do these habits survive contact with an actual team, people who didn’t sit in this interview and don’t share your instincts?
Grace: This is where most of this falls apart, honestly. A founder reads a great article, no offense, catches fire, runs one great quarterly review, sets sharp OKRs, blocks their calendar for a month. Then quarter two arrives and none of it happened because the habit lived entirely in their head and the company never built it into how it actually operates.
The businesses that make it stick turn the habit into a structure other people can run without them. The review has a template. The OKR checkpoint has a standing calendar invite that isn’t dependent on the founder remembering to send it. Someone other than the CEO owns the process, even if the CEO still owns the content. That’s the difference between a habit and a preference, and it’s also the difference between a general business strategy and a founder’s personal to do list.
Me: Is there a risk of overengineering that, though? Turning strategy into a bureaucratic exercise nobody enjoys?
Grace: Absolutely, and I’ve seen that failure mode too, usually in companies that hired someone from a much bigger company and imported their entire operating system wholesale. A forty person company does not need the strategic planning apparatus of a Fortune 500. Take the OKR checkpoint, the quarterly review, the calendar protection, but keep them lightweight. The goal is a habit that survives a bad week, not a process so heavy it collapses the first time someone’s out sick.
Habit #6: Steal the practice, not the whole playbook
Me: That’s a good segue. I wanted to ask about this specifically. A lot of business owners read about what a huge company does and try to copy it wholesale. What goes wrong there?
Grace: Context goes missing, mostly. A practice that works at a company with a dedicated strategy team, a data warehouse, and a hundred people whose entire job is operational rigor is not going to transplant cleanly into a ten person business where the founder is also answering support tickets. I’ve watched founders try to run a full annual strategic planning offsite that copies what they read some big consulting firm does, and it just… doesn’t fit. Wrong scale, wrong resourcing, wrong stakes.
What I tell people instead: steal the underlying practice, not the specific implementation. The practice behind a big company’s strategic offsite is “periodically step back from operations and interrogate the plan with fresh eyes.” You can do that in an afternoon with three people and a whiteboard. You don’t need the facilitator, the advance survey, and the two day agenda to get the actual value.
Me: So the habit is transferable even when the exact process isn’t.
Grace: Exactly, and that’s really the whole idea behind “stealing” habits instead of copying strategies. A general business strategy is specific to a company’s situation. A habit (reviewing honestly, setting goals you can fail, protecting your attention, delegating on purpose, making the big calls carefully and the small calls fast) is portable. That’s what actually travels from one business to another.
What to actually do in the next two weeks
Pick one habit and put a real date on it
Me: Let’s end practically. Someone reading this agrees with everything you’ve said and wants to start now, not “next quarter” in some abstract sense. What do they do this week?
Grace: Pick one habit, just one, not all six we talked about, and put it on the calendar before you close this article. Not “I’ll start doing quarterly reviews.” An actual date, an actual invite, an actual owner. If it’s the review, block ninety minutes three weeks from now and write down the three honest questions you’re going to ask. If it’s the calendar protection, block your first deep work window tomorrow morning and tell whoever manages your schedule that it’s not negotiable, the same way a client meeting would be.
This is really how a general business strategy gets built, one dated calendar entry at a time, not one big planning document.
Then check whether it actually happened
Then, and this is the part people skip, put a second date on the calendar to check whether you actually did it. Not whether it worked yet. Just whether it happened. People skip habits in the “did I even try” phase far more often than they fail them in the “did it produce results” phase. Solve for showing up first. Solving for results comes after you’ve proven to yourself you’ll actually run the play.
Me: Last question. If someone does exactly one of these six things this quarter and nothing else, which one moves the needle most?
Grace: The quarterly review, without question. Everything else, the goals, the calendar discipline, the delegation, the decision making, those are things you’ll discover you need because you started honestly reviewing what’s actually happening in the business. The review is the habit that generates the other habits, and honestly, the habit that generates the rest of your general business strategy too. Start there.
Key Takeaways
Strategy that survives past January isn’t a document. A general business strategy worth keeping is a small set of repeatable habits: an honest quarterly review, goals with real teeth, protected time for actual thinking, delegation done on purpose, a short list of decisions worth agonizing over, and practices that outlast any one person’s memory. Pick one, put a real date on it, and check back in to see whether it happened before worrying about whether it worked.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a general business strategy, in plain terms?
A general business strategy is the overall approach a company takes to reach its long term goals: the choices about where to compete, how to allocate limited resources, and what to prioritize when everything feels urgent. For a deeper definition and how it differs from tactics, see What Is Business Strategy? A Clear Guide for Future Business Leaders.
How often should a small business review its strategy?
Quarterly is the most common rhythm, with lighter checkpoints every two weeks to see whether goals still make sense. For a practical walkthrough of running these reviews well, see How to Conduct Quarterly Business Reviews (QBRs).
Are OKRs only for large companies?
No, large tech companies popularized them, but the framework scales down well. Smaller businesses often benefit more, since a small, aligned team can move faster once everyone shares the same key results. See Why Business Owners Need OKRs and OKRs: The Ultimate Guide to Objectives and Key Results for a full breakdown.
What’s the biggest mistake business owners make with strategic planning?
Copying the exact process a much larger company uses instead of adapting the underlying practice to their own size and resources. Overly heavy processes tend to collapse the first time things get busy. The goal is a lightweight habit that survives a bad week.
How do I know if I’m delegating effectively?
Ask whether you’re handing off tasks with enough context for someone to succeed at roughly your own quality bar, and whether you’re delegating for the right reason: building capability in your team, not just clearing your own plate. For more on this distinction, see Effective Delegation: A Leader’s Time Management Tool.
What did Peter Drucker mean by “effective executive”?
Drucker argued effectiveness is a learnable set of practices, not a personality trait: knowing where your time actually goes, focusing on contribution over effort, and making a small number of decisions well rather than many decisions quickly. Read the original framing in What Makes an Effective Executive.
References
- Harvard Business Review: What Makes an Effective Executive
- Indeed: How to Conduct Quarterly Business Reviews (QBRs)
- U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Why Business Owners Need OKRs
- Atlassian: OKRs: The Ultimate Guide to Objectives and Key Results
- Google re:Work: Guides: Set goals with OKRs
- Leaders.com: Effective Delegation: A Leader’s Time Management Tool
- StealthAgents Research: Executive Time-Blocking Statistics 2026: How Leaders Protect Focus Time and Deep Work
- ESCP Business School: What Is Business Strategy? A Clear Guide for Future Business Leaders
